Paper detail

An FPTAS for Counting Proper Four-Colorings on Cubic Graphs

Graph coloring is arguably the most exhaustively studied problem in the area of approximate counting. It is conjectured that there is a fully polynomial-time (randomized) approximation scheme (FPTAS/FPRAS) for counting the number of proper colorings as long as $q \geq Δ+ 1$, where $q$ is the number of colors and $Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph. The bound of $q = Δ+ 1$ is the uniqueness threshold for Gibbs measure on $Δ$-regular infinite trees. However, the conjecture remained open even for any fixed $Δ\geq 3$ (The cases of $Δ=1, 2$ are trivial). In this paper, we design an FPTAS for counting the number of proper $4$-colorings on graphs with maximum degree $3$ and thus confirm the conjecture in the case of $Δ=3$. This is the first time to achieve this optimal bound of $q = Δ+ 1$. Previously, the best FPRAS requires $q > \frac{11}{6} Δ$ and the best deterministic FPTAS requires $q > 2.581Δ+ 1$ for general graphs. In the case of $Δ=3$, the best previous result is an FPRAS for counting proper 5-colorings. We note that there is a barrier to go beyond $q = Δ+ 2$ for single-site Glauber dynamics based FPRAS and we overcome this by correlation decay approach. Moreover, we develop a number of new techniques for the correlation decay approach which can find applications in other approximate counting problems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.