Paper detail

An exact upper bound for the sum of powers of element orders in non-cyclic finite groups

For a finite group $G$, let $ψ(G)$ denote the sum of element orders of $G$. This function was introduced by Amiri, Amiri, and Isaacs in 2009 and they proved that for any finite group $G$ of order $n$, $ψ(G)$ is maximum if and only if $G \simeq \mathbb{Z}_n$ where $\mathbb{Z}_n$ denotes the cyclic group of order $n$. Furthermore, Herzog, Longobardi, and Maj in 2018 proved that if $G$ is non-cyclic, $ψ(G) \leq \frac{7}{11} ψ(\mathbb{Z}_n)$. Amiri and Amiri in 2014 introduced the function $ψ_k(G)$ which is defined as the sum of the $k$-th powers of element orders of $G$ and they showed that for every positive integer $k$, $ψ_k(G)$ is also maximum if and only if $G$ is cyclic. In this paper, we have been able to prove that if $G$ is a non-cyclic group of order $n$, then $ψ_k(G) \leq \frac{1+3.2^k}{1+2.4^k+2^k} ψ_k(\mathbb{Z}_n)$. Setting $k=1$ in our result, we immediately get the result of Herzog et al. as a simple corollary. Besides, a recursive formula for $ψ_k(G)$ is also obtained for finite abelian $p$-groups $G$, using which one can explicitly find out the exact value of $ψ_k(G)$ for finite abelian groups $G$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.