Paper detail

An estimation of the effective number of electrons contributing to the coordinate measurement with a TPC II

For time projection chambers (TPCs) the accuracy in measurement of the track coordinates along the pad-row direction deteriorates with the drift distance (z): Resolution**2 = D**2 * z / N_eff, where D is the diffusion constant and N_eff is the effective number of electrons. Experimentally it has been shown that N_eff is smaller than the average number of drift electrons per pad row (<N>). In the previous work we estimated N_eff by means of a simple numerical simulation for argon-based gas mixtures, taking into account the diffusion of electrons only in the pad-row direction [1]. The simulation showed that N_eff could be as small as 30% of <N> because of the combined effect of statistical fluctuations in the number of drift electrons (N) and in their multiplication in avalanches. In this paper, we evaluate the influence of the diffusion normal to the pad-row direction on the effective number of electrons. The de-clustering of the drift electrons due to the diffusion makes N_eff drift-distance dependent. However, its effect was found to be too small to explain the discrepancy between the values of N_eff measured with two TPC prototypes different in size.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.