Paper detail

An ensemble of random graphs with identical degree distribution

Degree distribution, or equivalently called degree sequence, has been commonly used to be one of most significant measures for studying a large number of complex networks with which some well-known results have been obtained. By contrast, in this paper, we report a fact that two arbitrarily chosen networks with identical degree distribution can have completely different other topological structure, such as diameter, spanning trees number, pearson correlation coefficient, and so forth. Besides that, for a given degree distribution (as power-law distribution with exponent $γ=3$ discussed here), it is reasonable to ask how many network models with such a constraint we can have. To this end, we generate an ensemble of this kind of random graphs with $P(k)\sim k^{-γ}$ ($γ=3$), denoted as graph space $\mathcal{N}(p,q,t)$ where probability parameters $p$ and $q$ hold on $p+q=1$, and indirectly show the cardinality of $\mathcal{N}(p,q,t)$ seems to be large enough in the thermodynamics limit, i.e., $N\rightarrow\infty$, by varying values of $p$ and $q$. From the theoretical point of view, given an ultrasmall constant $p_{c}$, perhaps only graph model $N(1,0,t)$ is small-world and other are not in terms of diameter. And then, we study spanning trees number on two deterministic graph models and obtain both upper bound and lower bound for other members. Meanwhile, for arbitrary $p(\neq1)$, we prove that graph model $N(p,q,t)$ does go through two phase transitions over time, i.e., starting by non-assortative pattern and then suddenly going into disassortative region, and gradually converging to initial place (non-assortative point). Among of them, one "null" graph model is built.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.