Paper detail

An Empirical Study on Text-Independent Speaker Verification based on the GE2E Method

While many researchers in the speaker recognition area have started to replace the former classical state-of-the-art methods with deep learning techniques, some of the traditional i-vector-based methods are still state-of-the-art in the context of text-independent speaker verification. Google's Generalized End-to-End Loss for Speaker Verification (GE2E), a deep learning-based technique using long short-term memory units, has recently gained a lot of attention due to its speed in convergence and generalization. In this study, we aim at further studying the GE2E method and comparing different scenarios in order to investigate all of its aspects. Various experiments including the effects of a random sampling of test and enrollment utterances, test utterance duration, and the number of enrollment utterances are discussed in this article. Furthermore, we compare the GE2E method with the baseline state-of-the-art i-vector-based methods for text-independent speaker verification and show that it outperforms them by resulting in lower error rates while being end-to-end and requiring less training time for convergence.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.