Paper detail

An Empirical Study of Person Re-Identification with Attributes

Person re-identification aims to identify a person from an image collection, given one image of that person as the query. There is, however, a plethora of real-life scenarios where we may not have a priori library of query images and therefore must rely on information from other modalities. In this paper, an attribute-based approach is proposed where the person of interest (POI) is described by a set of visual attributes, which are used to perform the search. We compare multiple algorithms and analyze how the quality of attributes impacts the performance. While prior work mostly relies on high precision attributes annotated by experts, we conduct a human-subject study and reveal that certain visual attributes could not be consistently described by human observers, making them less reliable in real applications. A key conclusion is that the performance achieved by non-expert attributes, instead of expert-annotated ones, is a more faithful indicator of the status quo of attribute-based approaches for person re-identification.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.