Paper detail

An Empirical Study of Intel Xeon Phi

With at least 50 cores, Intel Xeon Phi is a true many-core architecture. Featuring fairly powerful cores, two cache levels, and very fast interconnections, the Xeon Phi can get a theoretical peak of 1000 GFLOPs and over 240 GB/s. These numbers, as well as its flexibility - it can be used both as a coprocessor or as a stand-alone processor - are very tempting for parallel applications looking for new performance records. In this paper, we present an empirical study of Xeon Phi, stressing its performance limits and relevant performance factors, ultimately aiming to present a simplified view of the machine for regular programmers in search for performance. To do so, we have micro-benchmarked the main hardware components of the processor - the cores, the memory hierarchies, the ring interconnect, and the PCIe connection. We show that, in ideal microbenchmarking conditions, the performance that can be achieved is very close to the theoretical peak, as given in the official programmer's guide. We have also identified and quantified several causes for significant performance penalties. Our findings have been captured in four optimization guidelines, and used to build a simplified programmer's view of Xeon Phi, eventually enable the design and prototyping of applications on a functionality-based model of the architecture.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.