Paper detail

An Efficient Updation Approach for Enumerating Maximal $(Δ, γ)$\mbox{-}Cliques of a Temporal Network

Given a temporal network $\mathcal{G}(\mathcal{V}, \mathcal{E}, \mathcal{T})$, $(\mathcal{X},[t_a,t_b])$ (where $\mathcal{X} \subseteq \mathcal{V}(\mathcal{G})$ and $[t_a,t_b] \subseteq \mathcal{T}$) is said to be a $(Δ, γ)$\mbox{-}clique of $\mathcal{G}$, if for every pair of vertices in $\mathcal{X}$, there must exist at least $γ$ links in each $Δ$ duration within the time interval $[t_a,t_b]$. Enumerating such maximal cliques is an important problem in temporal network analysis, as it reveals contact pattern among the nodes of $\mathcal{G}$. In this paper, we study the maximal $(Δ, γ)$\mbox{-}clique enumeration problem in online setting; i.e.; the entire link set of the network is not known in advance, and the links are coming as a batch in an iterative manner. Suppose, the link set till time stamp $T_{1}$ (i.e., $\mathcal{E}^{T_{1}}$), and its corresponding $(Δ, γ)$-clique set are known. In the next batch (till time $T_{2}$), a new set of links (denoted as $\mathcal{E}^{(T_1,T_2]}$) is arrived.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.