Paper detail

An efficient asymptotic approach for testing monotone proportions assuming an underlying logit based order dose-response model

When an underlying logit based order dose-response model is considered with small or moderate sample sizes, the Cochran-Armitage (CA) test represents the most efficient test in the framework of the test-statistics applied with asymptotic distributions for testing monotone proportions. The Wald and likelihood ratio (LR) test have much worse behaviour in type error I in comparison with the CA test. It suffers, however, from the weakness of not maintaining the nominal size. In this paper a family of test-statistics based on ϕ-divergence measures is proposed and their asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis is obtained either for one-sided or two-sided hypothesis testing. A numerical example based on real data illustrates that the proposed test-statistics are simple for computation and moreover, the necessary goodness-of-fit test-statistic are easily calculated from them. The simulation study shows that the test based on the Cressie and Read (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 46, 440-464, 1989) divergence measure usually provides a better nominal size than the CA test for small and moderate sample sizes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.