Paper detail

An Efficient and Balanced Platform for Data-Parallel Subsampling Workloads

With the advent of internet services, data started growing faster than it can be processed. To personalize user experience, this enormous data has to be processed in real time, in interactive fashion. In order to achieve faster data processing often a statistical method called subsampling. Subsampling workloads compute statistics from a random subset of sample data (i.e., a subsample). Data-parallel platforms group these samples into tasks; each task subsamples its data in parallel. Current, state-of-the-art platforms such as Hadoop are built for large tasks that run for long periods of time, but applications with smaller average task sizes suffer large overheads on these platforms. Tasks in subsampling workloads are sized to minimize the number of overall cache misses, and these tasks can complete in seconds. This technique can reduce the overall length of a map-reduce job, but only when the savings from the cache miss rate reduction are not eclipsed by the platform overhead of task creation and data distribution. In this thesis, we propose a data-parallel platform with an efficient data distribution component that breaks data-parallel subsampling workloads into compute clusters with tiny tasks. Each tiny task completes in few hundreds of milliseconds to seconds. Tiny tasks reduce processor cache misses caused by random subsampling, which speeds up per-task running time. However, they cause significant scheduling overheads and data distribution challenges. We propose a task knee-pointing algorithm and a dynamic scheduler that schedules the tasks to worker nodes based on the availability and response times of the data nodes. We compare our framework against various configurations of BashReduce and Hadoop. A detailed discussion of tiny task approach on two workloads, EAGLET and Netflix movie rating is presented.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.