Paper detail

An Assumption-Free Exact Test For Fixed-Design Linear Models With Exchangeable Errors

We propose the Cyclic Permutation Test (CPT) to test general linear hypotheses for linear models. This test is non-randomized and valid in finite samples with exact Type I error $α$ for an arbitrary fixed design matrix and arbitrary exchangeable errors, whenever $1 / α$ is an integer and $n / p \ge 1 / α- 1$. The test involves applying the marginal rank test to $1 / α$ linear statistics of the outcome vector, where the coefficient vectors are determined by solving a linear system such that the joint distribution of the linear statistics is invariant with respect to a non-standard cyclic permutation group under the null hypothesis.The power can be further enhanced by solving a secondary non-linear travelling salesman problem, for which the genetic algorithm can find a reasonably good solution. Extensive simulation studies show that the CPT has comparable power to existing tests. When testing for a single contrast of coefficients, an exact confidence interval can be obtained by inverting the test. Furthermore, we provide a selective yet extensive literature review of the century-long efforts on this problem, highlighting the novelty of our test.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.