Paper detail

An approximate Bayes factor based high dimensional MANOVA using Random Projections

High-dimensional mean vector testing problem for two or more groups remain a very active research area. In these setting, traditional tests are not applicable because they involve the inversion of rank deficient group covariance matrix. In current approaches, this problem is addressed by simply looking at a test assuming a sparse or diagonal covariance matrix potentially ignoring complex dependency between features. In this paper, we develop a Bayes factor (BF) based testing procedure for comparing two or more population means in (very) high dimensional settings. Two versions of the Bayes factor based test statistics are considered which are based on a Random projection (RP) approach. RPs are appealing since they make not assumption about the form of the dependency across features in the data. The final test statistic is based on an ensemble of Bayes factors corresponding to multiple replications of randomly projected data. Both proposed test statistics are compared through a battery of simulation settings. Finally they are applied to the analysis of a publicly available genomic single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) dataset.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.