Paper detail

An analytic model for a cooperative ballistic deposition in one dimension

We formulate a model for a cooperative ballistic deposition (CBD) process whereby the incoming particles are correlated with the ones already adsorbed via attractive force. The strength of the correlation is controlled by a tunable parameter $a$ that interpolates the classical car parking problem at $a=0$, the ballistic deposition at $a=1$ and the CBD model at $a>1$. The effects of the correlation in the CBD model are as follows. The jamming coverage $q(a)$ increases with the strength of attraction $a$ due to an ever increasing tendency of cluster formation. The system almost reaches the closest packing structure as $a\to\infty$ but never forms a percolating cluster which is typical to 1D system. In the large $a$ regime, the mean cluster size $k$ increases as $a^{1/2}$. Furthermore, the asymptotic approach towards the closest packing is purely algebraic both with $a$ as $q(\infty)-q(a) \sim a^{-1/2}$ and with $k$ as $q(\infty)-q(k) \sim k^{-1}$ where $q(\infty)\simeq 1$.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.