Paper detail

An analysis of load-balancing algorithms on edge-Markovian evolving graphs

Analysis of algorithms on time-varying networks (often called evolving graphs) is a modern challenge in theoretical computer science. The edge-Markovian is a relatively simple and comprehensive model of evolving graphs: every pair of vertices which is not a current edge independently becomes an edge with probability $p$ at each time-step, as well as every edge disappears with probability $q$. Clearly, the edge-Markovian graph changes its shape depending on the current shape, and the dependency refuses some useful techniques for an independent sequence of random graphs which often behaves similarly to a static random graph. It motivates this paper to develop a new technique for analysis of algorithms on edge-Markovian evolving graphs. Specifically speaking, this paper is concerned with load-balancing, which is a popular subject in distributed computing, and we analyze the so-called random matching algorithms, which is a standard scheme for load-balancing. We prove that major random matching algorithms achieve nearly optimal load balance in $O(r \log (Δn))$ steps on edge-Markovian evolving graphs, where $r = \max\{p/(1-q), (1-q)/p\}$, $n$ is the number of vertices (i.e., processors) and $Δ$ denotes the initial gap of loads unbalance. We remark that the independent sequences of random graphs correspond to $r=1$. To avoid the difficulty of an analysis caused by a complex correlation with the history of an execution, we develop a simple proof technique based on history-independent bounds. As far as we know, this is the first theoretical analysis of load-balancing on randomly evolving graphs, not only for the edge-Markovian but also for the independent sequences of random graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.