Paper detail

An analysis of $H \to γγ$ up to three-loop QCD corrections

The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a convenient way for setting the optimal renormalization scales for high-energy processes, which can eliminate the conventional renormalization scale error via an order-by-order manner. At present, we make a detailed PMC analysis on the Higgs decay $H\rightarrow γγ$ up to three-loop QCD corrections. As an important point of deriving reliable PMC estimation, it is noted that only those $\{β_i\}$-terms that rightly determine the running behavior of coupling constant via the renormalization group equation should be absorbed into the coupling constant, and those $\{β_i\}$-terms that pertain to the quark mass renormalization and etc. should be kept as a separate. To avoid confusion of separating and absorbing different types of $\{β_i\}$-terms into the coupling constant, we first transform the decay width in terms of top quark $\overline{\rm MS}$ mass into that of on-shell mass and then apply the PMC scale setting. After applying PMC scale setting, the final estimation is conformal and is scheme-independent and scale-independent. Up to three-loop QCD corrections, we obtain a PMC scale $μ^{\rm PMC}_{r}=242.3$ GeV $\sim 2M_H$, which is optimal and highly independent of any choice of initial scale. Thus, we obtain a more accurate scale-independent prediction by taking the Higgs mass as the same as that of ATLAS and CMS measurements, i.e., $Γ(H\rightarrow γγ)|_{\rm ATLAS}=9.504^{+0.226}_{-0.252}$ keV and $Γ(H\rightarrow γγ)|_{\rm CMS}=9.568^{+0.195}_{-0.191}$ keV, where the error is caused by the measured Higgs mass, i.e. the Higgs mass $M_{H}$ is taken as $125.5\pm0.2^{+0.5}_{-0.6}$ GeV for ATLAS and $125.7\pm0.3\pm0.3$ GeV for CMS, respectively.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.