Paper detail

An AI model for Rapid and Accurate Identification of Chemical Agents in Mass Casualty Incidents

In this report we examine the effectiveness of WISER in identification of a chemical culprit during a chemical based Mass Casualty Incident (MCI). We also evaluate and compare Binary Decision Tree (BDT) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) using the same experimental conditions as WISER. The reverse engineered set of Signs/Symptoms from the WISER application was used as the training set and 31,100 simulated patient records were used as the testing set. Three sets of simulated patient records were generated by 5%, 10% and 15% perturbation of the Signs/Symptoms of each chemical record. While all three methods achieved a 100% training accuracy, WISER, BDT and ANN produced performances in the range of: 1.8%-0%, 65%-26%, 67%-21% respectively. A preliminary investigation of dimensional reduction using ANN illustrated a dimensional collapse from 79 variables to 40 with little loss of classification performance.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.