Paper detail

America Tweets China: A Fine-Grained Analysis of the State and Individual Characteristics Regarding Attitudes towards China

The U.S.-China relationship is arguably the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st century. Typically it is measured through opinion polls, for example, by Gallup and Pew Institute. In this paper, we propose a new method to measure U.S.-China relations using data from Twitter, one of the most popular social networks. Compared with traditional opinion polls, our method has two distinctive advantages. First, our sample size is significantly larger. National opinion polls have at most a few thousand samples. Our data set has 724,146 samples. The large size of our data set enables us to perform state level analysis, which so far even large opinion polls have left unexplored. Second, our method can control for fixed state and date effects. We first demonstrate the existence of inter-state and inter-day variances and then control for these variances in our regression analysis. Empirically, our study is able to replicate the stylized results from opinion polls as well as generate new insights. At the state level, we find New York, Michigan, Indiana and Arizona are the top four most China-friendly states. Wyoming, South Dakota, Kansas and Nevada are most homogeneous. At the individual level, we find attitudes towards China improve as an individual's Twitter experience grows longer and more intense. We also find individuals of Chinese ethnicity are statistically more China-friendly.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.