Paper detail

Alternative expression for the maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones

Emanuel's concept of maximum potential intensity (E-PI) estimates the maximum velocity of tropical cyclones from environmental parameters. At the point of maximum wind, E-PI's key equation relates proportionally the centrifugal acceleration (squared maximum velocity divided by radius) to the radial gradient of saturated moist entropy. The proportionality coefficient depends on the outflow temperature. Here it is shown that a different relationship between the same quantities derives straightforwardly from the gradient-wind balance and the definition of entropy, with the proportionality coefficient depending on the radial gradient of local air temperature. The robust alternative reveals a previously unexplored constraint: for E-PI to be valid, the outflow temperature should be a function of the radial temperature gradient at the point of maximum wind. When the air is horizontally isothermal (which, as we argue, is not an uncommon condition), this constraint cannot be satisfied, and E-PI's key equation underestimates the squared maximum velocity by approximately twofold. This explains "superintensity" (maximum wind speeds exceeding E-PI). The new formulation predicts less superintensity at higher temperatures, corroborating recent numerical simulations. Previous analyses are re-evaluated to reveal inconsistent support for the explanation of superintensity by supergradient winds alone. In Hurricane Isabel 2003, maximum superintensity is found to be associated with minimal gradient-wind imbalance. Modified to diagnostically account for supergradient winds, the new formulation shows that air temperature increasing towards the storm center can mask the effect of gradient-wind imbalance, thus reducing "superintensity" and formally bringing E-PI closer to observations. The implications of these findings for assessing real storms are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.