Paper detail

Almost-Tight Distributed Minimum Cut Algorithms

We study the problem of computing the minimum cut in a weighted distributed message-passing networks (the CONGEST model). Let $λ$ be the minimum cut, $n$ be the number of nodes in the network, and $D$ be the network diameter. Our algorithm can compute $λ$ exactly in $O((\sqrt{n} \log^{*} n+D)λ^4 \log^2 n)$ time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that explicitly studies computing the exact minimum cut in the distributed setting. Previously, non-trivial sublinear time algorithms for this problem are known only for unweighted graphs when $λ\leq 3$ due to Pritchard and Thurimella's $O(D)$-time and $O(D+n^{1/2}\log^* n)$-time algorithms for computing $2$-edge-connected and $3$-edge-connected components. By using the edge sampling technique of Karger's, we can convert this algorithm into a $(1+ε)$-approximation $O((\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n+D)ε^{-5}\log^3 n)$-time algorithm for any $ε>0$. This improves over the previous $(2+ε)$-approximation $O((\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n+D)ε^{-5}\log^2 n\log\log n)$-time algorithm and $O(ε^{-1})$-approximation $O(D+n^{\frac{1}{2}+ε} \mathrm{poly}\log n)$-time algorithm of Ghaffari and Kuhn. Due to the lower bound of $Ω(D+n^{1/2}/\log n)$ by Das Sarma et al. which holds for any approximation algorithm, this running time is tight up to a $ \mathrm{poly}\log n$ factor. To get the stated running time, we developed an approximation algorithm which combines the ideas of Thorup's algorithm and Matula's contraction algorithm. It saves an $ε^{-9}\log^{7} n$ factor as compared to applying Thorup's tree packing theorem directly. Then, we combine Kutten and Peleg's tree partitioning algorithm and Karger's dynamic programming to achieve an efficient distributed algorithm that finds the minimum cut when we are given a spanning tree that crosses the minimum cut exactly once.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.