Paper detail

AI outperformed every dermatologist: Improved dermoscopic melanoma diagnosis through customizing batch logic and loss function in an optimized Deep CNN architecture

Melanoma, one of most dangerous types of skin cancer, re-sults in a very high mortality rate. Early detection and resection are two key points for a successful cure. Recent research has used artificial intelligence to classify melanoma and nevus and to compare the assessment of these algorithms to that of dermatologists. However, an imbalance of sensitivity and specificity measures affected the performance of existing models. This study proposes a method using deep convolutional neural networks aiming to detect melanoma as a binary classification problem. It involves 3 key features, namely customized batch logic, customized loss function and reformed fully connected layers. The training dataset is kept up to date including 17,302 images of melanoma and nevus; this is the largest dataset by far. The model performance is compared to that of 157 dermatologists from 12 university hospitals in Germany based on MClass-D dataset. The model outperformed all 157 dermatologists and achieved state-of-the-art performance with AUC at 94.4% with sensitivity of 85.0% and specificity of 95.0% using a prediction threshold of 0.5 on the MClass-D dataset of 100 dermoscopic images. Moreover, a threshold of 0.40858 showed the most balanced measure compared to other researches, and is promisingly application to medical diagnosis, with sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 93.8%.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.