Paper detail

Aharonov-Bohm effect and coherence length of charge e/4 quasiparticles at 5/2 filling factor measured in multiple small Fabry-Perot interferometers

Design of a Fabry-Perot (double point contact) interferometer to measure fractional quantum Hall effect quasiparticle charge properties, and in particular the 5/2 excitations, poses an important trade-off: the device size should be minimized to allow two path interference, since the coherence length of the quasiparticles in the correlated states are expected be limited, yet a small device promotes the dominance of Coulomb charging effects which would overwhelm the Aharonov-Bohm interference effect. In this study a series of small but different size interferometers from the same high density heterostructure wafer are examined for the presence of Coulomb effects versus Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) interference effect when operated in gate configurations that support the 5/2, 7/3, and 8/3 fractional quantum Hall effects. The device sizes vary by more than a factor of three, and over this range explicitly show specific properties of A-B interference, but not Coulomb dominated effects. Given these A-B interference results, the coherence length of the charge e/4 interference is extracted. The coherence length of non-Abelian e/4 quasiparticles is an important parameter for design and development of complex interference devices used to study and apply this exotic excitation. As in prior observations of e/4 excitations, A-B e/4 and e/2 oscillations in alternation are observed in these multiple devices. The amplitudes of the e/4 oscillations are observed to be dramatically reduced for larger area interferometers. Path-length limits are derived from interferometer areas determined directly by A-B measurements, and the attenuation lengths of the e/4 oscillations are shown to be micron to sub-micron scale. This coherence length is consistent with that of the 7/3 excitations measured here, and consistent with theoretical models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.