Paper detail

Ag diffusion in SiC high-energy grain boundaries: kinetic Monte Carlo study with first-principle calculations

The diffusion of silver (Ag) impurities in high energy grain boundaries (HEGBs) of cubic (3C) silicon carbide (SiC) is studied using an ab initio based kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model. This study assesses the hypothesis that the HEGB diffusion is responsible for Ag release in Tristructural-Isotropic fuel particles, and provides a specific example to increase understanding of impurity diffusion in highly disordered grain boundaries. The HEGB environment was modeled by an amorphous SiC. The structure and stability of Ag defects were calculated using density functional theory code. The defect energetics suggested that the fastest diffusion takes place via an interstitial mechanism in a-SiC. The formation energy of Ag interstitials and the kinetic resolved activation energies between them were well approximated with Gaussian distributions that were then sampled in the kMC. The diffusion of Ag was simulated with the effective medium model using kMC. At 1200-1600C, Ag in a HEGB is predicted to exhibit an Arrhenius type diffusion and with a diffusion prefactor and effective activation energy of (2.73+-1.09)*10-10 m2s-1 and 2.79+-0.18 eV, respectively. The comparison between HEGB results to other theoretical studies suggested not only that GB diffusion is predominant over bulk diffusion, but also that the HEGB is one of fastest grain boundary paths for Ag diffusion in SiC. The Ag diffusion coefficient in the HEGB shows a good agreement with ion-implantation measurements, but is 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than the diffusion coefficients extracted from integral release measurements. The discrepancy between GB diffusion and integral release measurements suggests that other contributions are responsible for the fast release of Ag in some experiments and we propose that these contributions may arise from radiation enhanced diffusion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.