Paper detail

Affine reductions for LPs and SDPs

We define a reduction mechanism for LP and SDP formulations that degrades approximation factors in a controlled fashion. Our reduction mechanism is a minor restriction of classical reductions establishing inapproximability in the context of PCP theorems. As a consequence we establish strong linear programming inapproximability (for LPs with a polynomial number of constraints) for many problems. In particular we obtain a $3/2-\varepsilon$ inapproximability for VertexCover answering an open question in [arXiv:1309.0563] and we answer a weak version of our sparse graph conjecture posed in [arXiv:1311.4001] showing an inapproximability factor of $1/2+\varepsilon$ for bounded degree IndependentSet. In the case of SDPs, we obtain inapproximability results for these problems relative to the SDP-inapproximability of MaxCUT. Moreover, using our reduction framework we are able to reproduce various results for CSPs from [arXiv:1309.0563] via simple reductions from Max-2-XOR.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.