BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Daniel Zink

Daniel Zink appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational Complexity

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Affine reductions for LPs and SDPs

We define a reduction mechanism for LP and SDP formulations that degrades approximation factors in a controlled fashion. Our reduction mechanism is a minor restriction of classical reductions establishing inapproximability in the context of PCP theorems. As a consequence we establish strong linear programming inapproximability (for LPs with a polynomial number of constraints) for many problems. In particular we obtain a $3/2-\varepsilon$ inapproximability for VertexCover answering an open question in [arXiv:1309.0563] and we answer a weak version of our sparse graph conjecture posed in [arXiv:1311.4001] showing an inapproximability factor of $1/2+\varepsilon$ for bounded degree IndependentSet. In the case of SDPs, we obtain inapproximability results for these problems relative to the SDP-inapproximability of MaxCUT. Moreover, using our reduction framework we are able to reproduce various results for CSPs from [arXiv:1309.0563] via simple reductions from Max-2-XOR.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP

Yannakakis showed that the matching problem does not have a small symmetric linear program. Rothvoß recently proved that any, not necessarily symmetric, linear program also has exponential size. It is natural to ask whether the matching problem can be expressed compactly in a framework such as semidefinite programming (SDP) that is more powerful than linear programming but still allows efficient optimization. We answer this question negatively for symmetric SDPs: any symmetric SDP for the matching problem has exponential size. We also show that an O(k)-round Lasserre SDP relaxation for the metric traveling salesperson problem yields at least as good an approximation as any symmetric SDP relaxation of size $n^k$. The key technical ingredient underlying both these results is an upper bound on the degree needed to derive polynomial identities that hold over the space of matchings or traveling salesperson tours.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access