Paper detail

AESPA: Accuracy Preserving Low-degree Polynomial Activation for Fast Private Inference

Hybrid private inference (PI) protocol, which synergistically utilizes both multi-party computation (MPC) and homomorphic encryption, is one of the most prominent techniques for PI. However, even the state-of-the-art PI protocols are bottlenecked by the non-linear layers, especially the activation functions. Although a standard non-linear activation function can generate higher model accuracy, it must be processed via a costly garbled-circuit MPC primitive. A polynomial activation can be processed via Beaver's multiplication triples MPC primitive but has been incurring severe accuracy drops so far. In this paper, we propose an accuracy preserving low-degree polynomial activation function (AESPA) that exploits the Hermite expansion of the ReLU and basis-wise normalization. We apply AESPA to popular ML models, such as VGGNet, ResNet, and pre-activation ResNet, to show an inference accuracy comparable to those of the standard models with ReLU activation, achieving superior accuracy over prior low-degree polynomial studies. When applied to the all-RELU baseline on the state-of-the-art Delphi PI protocol, AESPA shows up to 42.1x and 28.3x lower online latency and communication cost.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.