Paper detail

Adversarial Examples for Model-Based Control: A Sensitivity Analysis

We propose a method to attack controllers that rely on external timeseries forecasts as task parameters. An adversary can manipulate the costs, states, and actions of the controllers by forging the timeseries, in this case perturbing the real timeseries. Since the controllers often encode safety requirements or energy limits in their costs and constraints, we refer to such manipulation as an adversarial attack. We show that different attacks on model-based controllers can increase control costs, activate constraints, or even make the control optimization problem infeasible. We use the linear quadratic regulator and convex model predictive controllers as examples of how adversarial attacks succeed and demonstrate the impact of adversarial attacks on a battery storage control task for power grid operators. As a result, our method increases control cost by $8500\%$ and energy constraints by $13\%$ on real electricity demand timeseries.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.