Paper detail

Advancing global sea ice prediction capabilities using a fully-coupled climate model with integrated machine learning

We showcase a hybrid modeling framework which embeds machine learning (ML) inference into the GFDL SPEAR climate model, for online sea ice bias correction during a set of global fully-coupled 1-year retrospective forecasts. We compare two hybrid versions of SPEAR to understand the importance of exposing ML models to coupled ice-atmosphere-ocean feedbacks before implementation into fully-coupled simulations: Hybrid_CPL (with feedbacks) and Hybrid_IO (without feedbacks). Relative to SPEAR, Hybrid_CPL systematically reduces seasonal forecast errors in the Arctic and significantly reduces Antarctic errors for target months May-December, with >2x error reduction in 4-6-month lead forecasts of Antarctic winter sea ice extent. Meanwhile, Hybrid_IO suffers from out-of-sample behavior which can trigger a chain of Southern Ocean feedbacks, leading to ice-free Antarctic summers. Our results demonstrate that ML can significantly improve numerical sea ice prediction capabilities and that exposing ML models to coupled ice-atmosphere-ocean processes is essential for generalization in fully-coupled simulations.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.