Paper detail

Advanced Evasion Attacks and Mitigations on Practical ML-Based Phishing Website Classifiers

Machine learning (ML) based approaches have been the mainstream solution for anti-phishing detection. When they are deployed on the client-side, ML-based classifiers are vulnerable to evasion attacks. However, such potential threats have received relatively little attention because existing attacks destruct the functionalities or appearance of webpages and are conducted in the white-box scenario, making it less practical. Consequently, it becomes imperative to understand whether it is possible to launch evasion attacks with limited knowledge of the classifier, while preserving the functionalities and appearance. In this work, we show that even in the grey-, and black-box scenarios, evasion attacks are not only effective on practical ML-based classifiers, but can also be efficiently launched without destructing the functionalities and appearance. For this purpose, we propose three mutation-based attacks, differing in the knowledge of the target classifier, addressing a key technical challenge: automatically crafting an adversarial sample from a known phishing website in a way that can mislead classifiers. To launch attacks in the white- and grey-box scenarios, we also propose a sample-based collision attack to gain the knowledge of the target classifier. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our evasion attacks on the state-of-the-art, Google's phishing page filter, achieved 100% attack success rate in less than one second per website. Moreover, the transferability attack on BitDefender's industrial phishing page classifier, TrafficLight, achieved up to 81.25% attack success rate. We further propose a similarity-based method to mitigate such evasion attacks, Pelican. We demonstrate that Pelican can effectively detect evasion attacks. Our findings contribute to design more robust phishing website classifiers in practice.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.