Paper detail

Addressing Variability in Reuse Prediction for Last-Level Caches

Last-Level Cache (LLC) represents the bulk of a modern CPU processor's transistor budget and is essential for application performance as LLC enables fast access to data in contrast to much slower main memory. However, applications with large working set size often exhibit streaming and/or thrashing access patterns at LLC. As a result, a large fraction of the LLC capacity is occupied by dead blocks that will not be referenced again, leading to inefficient utilization of the LLC capacity. To improve cache efficiency, the state-of-the-art cache management techniques employ prediction mechanisms that learn from the past access patterns with an aim to accurately identify as many dead blocks as possible. Once identified, dead blocks are evicted from LLC to make space for potentially high reuse cache blocks. In this thesis, we identify variability in the reuse behavior of cache blocks as the key limiting factor in maximizing cache efficiency for state-of-the-art predictive techniques. Variability in reuse prediction is inevitable due to numerous factors that are outside the control of LLC. The sources of variability include control-flow variation, speculative execution and contention from cores sharing the cache, among others. Variability in reuse prediction challenges existing techniques in reliably identifying the end of a block's useful lifetime, thus causing lower prediction accuracy, coverage, or both. To address this challenge, this thesis aims to design robust cache management mechanisms and policies for LLC in the face of variability in reuse prediction to minimize cache misses, while keeping the cost and complexity of the hardware implementation low. To that end, we propose two cache management techniques, one domain-agnostic and one domain-specialized, to improve cache efficiency by addressing variability in reuse prediction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.