Paper detail

Addressing systematic errors in axial distance measurements in single-emitter localization microscopy

Nanoscale localization of point emitters is critical to several methods in optical fluorescence microscopy, including single-molecule super-resolution imaging and tracking. While the precision of the localization procedure has been the topic of extensive study, localization accuracy has been less emphasized, in part due to the challenge of producing an experimental sample containing unperturbed point emitters at known three-dimensional positions in a relevant geometry. We report a new experimental system which reproduces a widely-adopted geometry in high-numerical aperture localization microscopy, in which molecules are situated in an aqueous medium above a glass coverslip imaged with an oil-immersion objective. We demonstrate a calibration procedure that enables measurement of the depth-dependent point spread function (PSF) for open aperture imaging as well as imaging with engineered PSFs with index mismatch. We reveal the complicated, depth-varying behavior of the focal plane position in this system and discuss the axial localization biases incurred by common approximations of this behavior. We compare our results to theoretical calculations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.