Paper detail

Adaptivity provably helps: information-theoretic limits on $l_0$ cost of non-adaptive sensing

The advantages of adaptivity and feedback are of immense interest in signal processing and communication with many positive and negative results. Although it is established that adaptivity does not offer substantial reductions in minimax mean square error for a fixed number of measurements, existing results have shown several advantages of adaptivity in complexity of reconstruction, accuracy of support detection, and gain in signal-to-noise ratio, under constraints on sensing energy. Sensing energy has often been measured in terms of the Frobenius Norm of the sensing matrix. This paper uses a different metric that we call the $l_0$ cost of a sensing matrix-- to quantify the complexity of sensing. Thus sparse sensing matrices have a lower cost. We derive information-theoretic lower bounds on the $l_0$ cost that hold for any non-adaptive sensing strategy. We establish that any non-adaptive sensing strategy must incur an $l_0$ cost of $Θ\left( N \log_2(N)\right) $ to reconstruct an $N$-dimensional, one--sparse signal when the number of measurements are limited to $Θ\left(\log_2 (N)\right)$. In comparison, bisection-type adaptive strategies only require an $l_0$ cost of at most $\mathcal{O}(N)$ for an equal number of measurements. The problem has an interesting interpretation as a sphere packing problem in a multidimensional space, such that all the sphere centres have minimum non-zero co-ordinates. We also discuss the variation in $l_0$ cost as the number of measurements increase from $Θ\left(\log_2 (N)\right)$ to $Θ\left(N\right)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.