Paper detail

Adaptive Regularized Submodular Maximization

In this paper, we study the problem of maximizing the difference between an adaptive submodular (revenue) function and an non-negative modular (cost) function under the adaptive setting. The input of our problem is a set of $n$ items, where each item has a particular state drawn from some known prior distribution $p$. The revenue function $g$ is defined over items and states, and the cost function $c$ is defined over items, i.e., each item has a fixed cost. The state of each item is unknown initially, one must select an item in order to observe its realized state. A policy $π$ specifies which item to pick next based on the observations made so far. Denote by $g_{avg}(π)$ the expected revenue of $π$ and let $c_{avg}(π)$ denote the expected cost of $π$. Our objective is to identify the best policy $π^o\in \arg\max_πg_{avg}(π)-c_{avg}(π)$ under a $k$-cardinality constraint. Since our objective function can take on both negative and positive values, the existing results of submodular maximization may not be applicable. To overcome this challenge, we develop a series of effective solutions with performance grantees. Let $π^o$ denote the optimal policy. For the case when $g$ is adaptive monotone and adaptive submodular, we develop an effective policy $π^l$ such that $g_{avg}(π^l) - c_{avg}(π^l) \geq (1-\frac{1}{e}-ε)g_{avg}(π^o) - c_{avg}(π^o)$, using only $O(nε^{-2}\log ε^{-1})$ value oracle queries. For the case when $g$ is adaptive submodular, we present a randomized policy $π^r$ such that $g_{avg}(π^r) - c_{avg}(π^r) \geq \frac{1}{e}g_{avg}(π^o) - c_{avg}(π^o)$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.