Paper detail

Adaptive Ranking Based Constraint Handling for Explicitly Constrained Black-Box Optimization

We propose a novel constraint-handling technique for the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). The proposed technique is aimed at solving explicitly constrained black-box continuous optimization problems, in which the explicit constraint is a constraint whereby the computational time for the constraint violation and its (numerical) gradient are negligible compared to that for the objective function. This method is designed to realize two invariance properties: invariance to the affine transformation of the search space, and invariance to the increasing transformation of the objective and constraint functions. The CMA-ES is designed to possess these properties for handling difficulties that appear in black-box optimization problems, such as non-separability, ill-conditioning, ruggedness, and the different orders of magnitude in the objective. The proposed constraint-handling technique (CHT), known as ARCH, modifies the underlying CMA-ES only in terms of the ranking of the candidate solutions. It employs a repair operator and an adaptive ranking aggregation strategy to compute the ranking. We developed test problems to evaluate the effects of the invariance properties, and performed experiments to empirically verify the invariance of the algorithm. We compared the proposed method with other CHTs on the CEC 2006 constrained optimization benchmark suite to demonstrate its efficacy. Empirical studies reveal that ARCH is able to exploit the explicitness of the constraint functions effectively, sometimes even more efficiently than an existing box-constraint handling technique on box-constrained problems, while exhibiting the invariance properties. Moreover, ARCH overwhelmingly outperforms CHTs by not exploiting the explicit constraints in terms of the number of objective function calls.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.