Paper detail

Adaptive Adversarial Training to Improve Adversarial Robustness of DNNs for Medical Image Segmentation and Detection

It is known that Deep Neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, and the adversarial robustness of DNNs could be improved by adding adversarial noises to training data (e.g., the standard adversarial training (SAT)). However, inappropriate noises added to training data may reduce a model's performance, which is termed the trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This problem has been sufficiently studied for the classification of whole images but has rarely been explored for image analysis tasks in the medical application domain, including image segmentation, landmark detection, and object detection tasks. In this study, we show that, for those medical image analysis tasks, the SAT method has a severe issue that limits its practical use: it generates a fixed and unified level of noise for all training samples for robust DNN training. A high noise level may lead to a large reduction in model performance and a low noise level may not be effective in improving robustness. To resolve this issue, we design an adaptive-margin adversarial training (AMAT) method that generates sample-wise adaptive adversarial noises for robust DNN training. In contrast to the existing, classification-oriented adversarial training methods, our AMAT method uses a loss-defined-margin strategy so that it can be applied to different tasks as long as the loss functions are well-defined. We successfully apply our AMAT method to state-of-the-art DNNs, using five publicly available datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that: (1) our AMAT method can be applied to the three seemingly different tasks in the medical image application domain; (2) AMAT outperforms the SAT method in adversarial robustness; (3) AMAT has a minimal reduction in prediction accuracy on clean data, compared with the SAT method; and (4) AMAT has almost the same training time cost as SAT.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.