Paper detail

Adapting censored regression methods to adjust for the limit of detection in the calibration of diagnostic rules for clinical mass spectrometry proteomic data

Despite the recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS), summarizing and analyzing high-throughput mass-spectrometry data remains a challenging task. This is, on the one hand, due to the complexity of the spectral signal which is measured, and on the other, due to the limit of detection (LOD). The LOD is related to the limitation of instruments in measuring markers at a relatively low level. As a consequence, the outcome data set from the quantification step of proteomic analysis often consists of a reduced list of peaks where any peak intensities below the detection limit threshold are reported as missings. In this work, we propose the use of censored data methodology to handle spectral measurements within the presence of LOD, recognizing that those have been censored due to left-censoring mechanisms on low-abundance proteins. We apply this approach to the particular problem of calibrating prediction rules through prior estimation of the average isotope expression in MALDI-FTICR mass-spectrometry data, collected in the context of a pancreatic cancer case-control study. Our idea is to replace the set of incomplete spectral measurements with the average intensity estimates and use those as new input to a prediction model. We evaluate the proposed methods, with respect to their predictive ability, by comparing their performance with the one achieved using the complete information as well as alternative/competitive methods to deal with the LOD.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.