Paper detail

Active microrheology of colloidal suspensions: simulation and microstructural theory

Accelerated Stokesian Dynamics (ASD) simulation and a microstructural theory are applied to study structure and the viscosity of hard-sphere Brownian suspensions in active microrheology (MR).We consider moderate to dense suspensions, from near to far from equilibrium conditions.The theory explicitly considers many-body hydrodynamic interactions (HIs) in active MR, and is compared with ASD.Two conditions of moving the probe with constant force (CF) and constant velocity (CV) are considered.The structure is quantified using the probability distribution of colloidal particles around the probe, g(r), which is computed as a solution to the pair Smoluchowski equation (SE) for 0.2<ϕ<0.50, and a range of Peclet numbers (Pe), describing the ratio of external force on the probe to thermal forces.Results of ASD and theory demonstrate that a wake zone depleted of bath particles behind the moving probe forms at large Pe, while a boundary-layer accumulation develops upstream.The wake length saturates at Pe>>1 for CF while it continuously grows in CV.This contrast in behavior is related to the dispersion in the motion of the probe under CF conditions, while CV motion has no dispersion.This effect is incorporated in the theory as a force-induced hydrodynamic diffusion flux in the pair SE. We also demonstrate that, despite this difference of structure in CF and CV, g(r) near the probe is set by Pe, for both CF and CV resulting in similar values for their viscosity.Using the theory, the structural anisotropy and Brownian viscosity near equilibrium are shown to be quantitatively similar in both CF and CV motions, which is in contrast with the dilute theory which predict distortions and Brownian viscosities twice as large in CV, relative to CF.This difference arises due to the many-body interactions associated with the equilibrium structure in the moderate to dense regime.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.