Paper detail

Accurate Measurement of the Cleavage Energy of Graphite

The basal plane cleavage energy (CE) of graphite is a key material parameter for understanding many of the unusual properties of graphite, graphene, and carbon nanotubes. The CE is equal to twice the surface energy and is closely related to the interlayer binding energy and exfoliation energy of graphite. Nonetheless, a wide range of values for these properties have been reported and no consensus has yet emerged as to their magnitude. Here, we report the first direct, accurate experimental measurement of the CE of graphite using a novel method based on the recently discovered self-retraction phenomenon in graphite. The measured value, 0.37 +/- 0.01 J/m2 for the incommensurate state of bicrystal graphite, is nearly invariant with respect to temperature (from 22°C to 198°C) and bicrystal twist angle, and insensitive to impurities (from the atmosphere). The cleavage energy for the ideal ABAB graphite stacking, 0.39 +/- 0.02 J/m2, is calculated based upon a combination of the measured CE and a theoretical calculation. These experimental measurements are ideal for use in evaluating the efficacy of competing theoretical approaches.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.