Paper detail

Accurate bare susceptibilities from full-potential $\textit{ab initio}$ calculations

Electronic susceptibilities are a very popular tool to study electronic and magnetic properties of materials, both in experiment and theory. Unfortunately, the numerical evaluation of even the bare susceptibility, which depends on the computation of matrix elements and sums over energy bands, is very work-intensive and therefore various approximations have been introduced to speed up the calculations. We present a reliable and efficient implementation to compute static as well as dynamic bare susceptibilities based on full-potential density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Based on the exact results we will assess the accuracy of replacing the matrix elements with a constant and the impact of truncating the sum over the energy bands. Results will be given for representative and topical materials, such as Cr, a classical transition metal, as well as for FeSe and LaFeAsO, examples of iron-based superconductors.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.