Paper detail

Accuracy of the analytical escape rate for a cusp barrier in the overdamping regime

For the first time, the accuracy of the approximate analytical Kramers formula for the thermal decay rate over a cusp barrier, $R_K$, is checked numerically for the overdamping regime. The numerical quasistationary rate, $R_D$, which is believed to be exact within the statistical errors is evaluated by means of computer modeling of the stochastic Langevin-type dynamical equations. The agreement between $R_K$ and $R_D$ significantly depends upon the friction strength and the height of the barrier in comparison to the thermal energy. The difference between $R_K$ and $R_D$ decreases with the dimensionless damping parameter $ϕ$, however, does not become smaller than 10-20%. The unexpected growth of the difference between $R_K$ and $R_D$ with the governing parameter is observed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.