Paper detail

Accelerating Physics-Informed Neural Network Training with Prior Dictionaries

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) can be regarded as general-purpose PDE solvers, but it might be slow to train PINNs on particular problems, and there is no theoretical guarantee of corresponding error bounds. In this manuscript, we propose a variant called Prior Dictionary based Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PD-PINNs). Equipped with task-dependent dictionaries, PD-PINNs enjoy enhanced representation power on the tasks, which helps to capture features provided by dictionaries so that the proposed neural networks can achieve faster convergence in the process of training. In various numerical simulations, compared with existing PINN methods, combining prior dictionaries can significantly enhance convergence speed. In terms of theory, we obtain the error bounds applicable to PINNs and PD-PINNs for solving elliptic partial differential equations of second order. It is proved that under certain mild conditions, the prediction error made by neural networks can be bounded by expected loss of PDEs and boundary conditions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.