Paper detail

Absolute Magnitude Calibration for Dwarfs Based on the Colour-Magnitude Diagrams of Galactic Clusters

We present two absolute magnitude calibrations for dwarfs based on colour-magnitude diagrams of Galactic clusters. The combination of the $M_g$ absolute magnitudes of the dwarf fiducial sequences of the clusters M92, M13, M5, NGC 2420, M67 and NGC 6791 with the corresponding metallicities provides absolute magnitude calibration for a given $(g-r)_0$ colour. The calibration is defined in the colour interval $0.25\leq (g-r)_0 \leq 1.25$ mag and it covers the metallicity interval $-2.15\leq \lbrack Fe/H\rbrack \leq +0.37$ dex. The absolute magnitude residuals obtained by the application of the procedure to another set of Galactic clusters lie in the interval $-0.15 \leq ΔM_g \leq +0.12$ mag. The mean and standard deviation of the residuals are $<ΔM_g>=-0.002$ and $σ=0.065$ mag, respectively. The calibration of the $M_J$ absolute magnitude in terms of metallicity is carried out by using the fiducial sequences of the clusters M92, M13, 47 Tuc, NGC 2158 and NGC 6791. It is defined in the colour interval $0.90 \leq (V-J)_0 \leq 1.75$ mag and it covers the same metallicity interval of the $M_g$ calibration. The absolute magnitude residuals obtained by the application of the procedure to the cluster M5 ($\lbrack Fe/H\rbrack=-1.40$ dex) and 46 solar metallicity, $-0.45 \leq \lbrack Fe/H\rbrack \leq +0.35$ dex, field stars lie in the interval -0.29 and +0.35 mag. However, the range of 87 per cent of them is rather shorter, $-0.2 \leq ΔM_J \leq +0.2$ mag. The mean and standard deviation of all residuals are $<ΔM_J>=0.05$ and $σ$=0.13 mag, respectively. The derived relations are applicable to stars older than 4 Gyr for the $M_g$ calibration, and older than 2 Gyr for the $M_J$ calibration. The cited limits are the ages of the youngest calibration clusters in the two systems.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.