Paper detail

Absence of finite-temperature ballistic charge transport in the 1D half-filled Hubbard model

Finite-temperature T>0 transport properties of integrable and nonintegrable one-dimensional (1D) many-particle quantum systems are rather different, showing in the metallic phases ballistic and diffusive behavior, respectively. The repulsive 1D Hubbard model is an integrable system of wide physical interest. For electronic densities $n\neq1$ it is an ideal conductor, with ballistic charge transport for T larger or equal to 0. In spite that it is solvable by the Bethe ansatz, at $n=1$ its T>0 transport properties are a collective-behavior issue that remains poorly understood. Here we combine that solution with symmetry to show that for on-site repulsion U>0 the charge stiffness D (T) vanishes for T>0 in the thermodynamic limit. This absence of finite-temperature ballistic charge transport is an exact result that clarifies a long-standing open problem.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.