Paper detail

Ab initio study of the crystal and electronic structure of mono- and bi-alkali antimonides: Stability, Goldschmidt-like tolerance factors, and optical properties

Mono- and bi-alkali antimonides, X$_2$YSb (X and Y from Group I), are promising for next-generation electron emitters due to their capability of producing high-quality electron beams. However, these materials are not yet well understood, in part due to the technical challenges in growing pure, ordered alkali antimonides. For example, in the current literature there is a lack of complete understanding of the mechanically stable crystal structures of these materials. As a first step towards understanding this issue, this paper presents an ab initio study of stability of single-crystal mono- and bi-alkali antimonides in the $D0_3$ structure, the structure generally assumed in the literature for these materials. Finding that many of these materials actually are unstable in the $D0_3$ structure, we formulate a new set of Goldschmidt-like tolerance factors that accurately predict $D0_3$ stability using a procedure analogous to machine-learning perceptron-based analysis. Next, we consider possible stable structures for materials that we predict to be unstable in the $D0_3$ structure. Taking as examples the mono- and bi-alkali antimonides Cs$_3$Sb and Cs$_2$KSb, which also are technologically interesting for photoemission and photoabsorption applications, respectively, we note that the most unstable phonon displacements are consistent with the cubic structure, and we therefore perform extensive ab initio searches to identify potential ground-state structures in a cubic lattice. Our X-ray diffraction experiments confirm that indeed these two materials are not stable in the $D0_3$ structure and show scattering that is consistent with our new, proposed stable structures. Finally, we explore ab initio the implications of the breaking of the $D0_3$ symmetry on the electronic structure, showing significant impact on the location of the optical absorption edge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.