Paper detail

A4-based see-saw model for realistic neutrino masses and mixing

We present an $A4$-based model where neutrino masses arise from a combination of see-saw mechanisms. The model is motivated by several small mixing and mass parameters indicated by the data. These are $θ_{13}$, the solar mass splitting, and the small deviation of $θ_{23}$ from maximal mixing (= $π/4$). We take the above as indications that at some level the small quantities are well-approximated by zero. In particular the mixing angles, to a zero order, should be either 0 or $π/4$. Accordingly, in this model the Type-II see-saw dominates and generates the larger atmospheric mass splitting and sets $θ_{23} = π/4$. The other mixing angles are vanishing as is the solar splitting. We show how the $A4$ assignment for the lepton doublets leads to this form. We also specify the $A4$ properties of the right-handed neutrinos which result in a smaller Type-I see-saw contribution that acts as a perturbation and shifts the angles $θ_{12}$ and $θ_{13}$ into the correct range and the desired value of $Δm^2_{solar}$ is produced. The $A4$ symmetry results in relationships between these quantities as well as with a small deviation of $θ_{23}$ from $π/4$. If the right-handed neutrino mass matrix, $M_R$, is chosen real then there is no leptonic CP-violation and only Normal Ordering is admissible. If $M_R$ is complex then Inverted Ordering is also allowed with the proviso that the CP-phase, $δ$, is large, i.e., $\sim π/2$ or $-π/2$. The preliminary results from NO$ν$A favouring Normal Ordering and $δ$ near $-π/2$ imply quasi-degenerate neutrino masses in this model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.