Paper detail

A weak*-topological dichotomy with applications in operator theory

Denote by $[0,ω_1)$ the locally compact Hausdorff space consisting of all countable ordinals, equipped with the order topology, and let $C_0[0,ω_1)$ be the Banach space of scalar-valued, continuous functions which are defined on $[0,ω_1)$ and vanish eventually. We show that a weakly$^*$ compact subset of the dual space of $C_0[0,ω_1)$ is either uniformly Eberlein compact, or it contains a homeomorphic copy of the ordinal interval $[0,ω_1]$. Using this result, we deduce that a Banach space which is a quotient of $C_0[0,ω_1)$ can either be embedded in a Hilbert-generated Banach space, or it is isomorphic to the direct sum of $C_0[0,ω_1)$ and a subspace of a Hilbert-generated Banach space. Moreover, we obtain a list of eight equivalent conditions describing the Loy-Willis ideal, which is the unique maximal ideal of the Banach algebra of bounded, linear operators on $C_0[0,ω_1)$. As a consequence, we find that this ideal has a bounded left approximate identity, thus resolving a problem left open by Loy and Willis, and we give new proofs, in some cases of stronger versions, of several known results about the Banach space $C_0[0,ω_1)$ and the operators acting on it.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.