Paper detail

A universal, operational theory of unicast multi-user communication with fidelity criteria

This is a three part paper. Optimality of source-channel separation for communication with a fidelity criterion when the channel is compound as defined by Csiszar and Korner in their book and general as defined by Verdu and Han, is proved in Part I. It is assumed that random codes are permitted. The word "universal" in the title of this paper refers to the fact that the channel model is compound. The proof uses a layered black-box or a layered input-output view-point. In particular, only the end-to-end description of the channel as being capable of communicating a source to within a certain distortion level is used when proving separation. This implies that the channel model does not play any role for separation to hold as long as there is a source model. Further implications of the layered black-box view-point are discussed. Optimality of source-medium separation for multi-user communication with fidelity criteria over a general, compound medium in the unicast setting is proved in Part II, thus generalizing Part I to the unicast, multi-user setting. Part III gets to an understanding of the question, "Why is a channel which is capable of communicating a source to within a certain distortion level, also capable of communicating bits at any rate less than the infimum of the rates needed to code the source to within the distortion level": this lies at the heart of why optimality of separation for communication with a fidelity criterion holds. The perspective taken to get to this understanding is a randomized covering-packing perspective, and the proof is operational.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.