Paper detail

A Two-Step Biopolymer Nucleation Model Shows a Nonequilibrium Critical Point

Biopolymer self-assembly pathways are central to biological activity, but are complicated by the ability of the monomeric subunits of biopolymers to adopt different conformational states. As a result, biopolymer nucleation often involves a two-step mechanism where the monomers first condense to form a metastable intermediate, and this then converts to a stable polymer by conformational rearrangement of its constituent monomers. While existing mathematical models neglect the dynamics by which intermediates convert to stable polymers, experiments and simulations show that these dynamics frequently occur on comparable timescales to condensation of intermediates and growth of mature polymers, and thus cannot be ignored. Moreover, nucleation intermediates are responsible for cell toxicity in pathologies such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and prion diseases. Due to the relationship between conformation and biological function, the slow conversion dynamics of these species will strongly affect their toxicity. In this study, we present a modified Oosawa model which explicitly accounts for simultaneous assembly and conversion. To describe the conversion dynamics, we propose an experimentally motivated initiation-propagation (IP) mechanism in which the stable phase arises locally within the intermediate, and then spreads through additional conversion events induced by nearest-neighbor interactions, analogous to one-dimensional Glauber dynamics. Our mathematical analysis shows that the competing timescales of assembly and conversion result in a nonequilibrium critical point, separating a regime where intermediates are kinetically unstable from one where conformationally mixed intermediates can accumulate. Our work provides the first general model of two-step biopolymer nucleation, which can be used to quantitatively predict the concentration and composition of biologically crucial intermediates.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.