Paper detail

A Two Dimensional Backward Heat Problem With Statistical Discrete Data

In this paper, we focus on the backward heat problem of finding the function $θ(x,y)=u(x,y,0)$ such that \[ {l l l} u_t - a(t)(u_{xx} + u_{yy}) & = f(x,y,t), & \qquad (x,y,t) \in Ω\times (0,T), u(x,y,T) & = h(x,y), & \qquad (x,y) \in\barΩ. \] where $Ω= (0,π) \times (0,π)$ and the heat transfer coefficient $a(t)$ is known. In our problem, the source $f = f(x,y,t)$ and the final data $h(x,y)$ are unknown. We only know random noise data $g_{ij}(t)$ and $d_{ij}$ satisfying the regression models g_{ij}(t) &=& f(x_i,y_j,t) + \varthetaξ_{ij}(t), d_{ij} &=& h(x_i,y_j) + σ_{ij}ε_{ij}, where $ξ_{ij}(t)$ are Brownian motions, $ε_{ij}\sim \mathcal{N}(0,1)$, $(x_i,y_j)$ are grid points of $Ω$ and $σ_{ij}, \vartheta$ are unknown positive constants. The noises $ξ_{ij}(t), ε_{ij}$ are mutually independent. From the known data $g_{ij}(t)$ and $d_{ij}$, we can recovery the initial temperature $θ(x,y)$. However, the result thus obtained is not stable and the problem is severely ill--posed. To regularize the instable solution, we use the trigonometric method in nonparametric regression associated with the truncated expansion method. In addition, convergence rate is also investigated numerically.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.