Paper detail

A thorny path of field theory: from triviality to interaction and confinement

Summation of the perturbation series for the Gell-Mann--Low function β(g) of ϕ^4 theory leads to the asymptotics β(g)=β_\infty g^αat g\to\infty, where α\approx 1 for space dimensions d=2,3,4. The natural hypothesis arises, that asymptotic behavior is β(g) \sim g for all d. Consideration of the "toy" zero-dimensional model confirms the hypothesis and reveals the origin of this result: it is related with a zero of a certain functional integral. This mechanism remains valid for arbitrary space dimensionality d. The same result for the asymptotics is obtained for explicitly accepted lattice regularization, while the use of high-temperature expansions allows to calculate the whole β-function. As a result, the β-function of four-dimensional ϕ^4 theory is appeared to be non-alternating and has a linear asymptotics at infinity. The analogous situation is valid for QED. According to the Bogoliubov and Shirkov classification, it means possibility to construct the continuous theory with finite interaction at large distances. This conclusion is in visible contradiction with the lattice results indicating triviality of ϕ^4 theory. This contradiction is resolved by a special character of renormalizability in ϕ^4 theory: to obtain the continuous renormalized theory, there is no need to eliminate a lattice from the bare theory. In fact, such kind of renormalizability is not accidental and can be understood in the framework of Wilson's many-parameter renormalization group. Application of these ideas to QCD shows that Wilson's theory of confinement is not purely illustrative, but has a direct relation to a real situation. As a result, the problem of analytical proof of confinement and a mass gap can be considered as solved, at least on the physical level of rigor.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.