Paper detail

A thermodynamic description of the glass state and its application to glass transition

Many properties of solids such as the glass state are commonly treated as nonequilibrium phenomena, which involve many conceptual difficulties. However, few studies have addressed the problem of understanding equilibrium itself. Equilibrium is commonly assessed based on the assumption that its thermodynamic state should be determined solely by temperature and pressure. However, this assumption must be reappraised from the beginning through a rigorous definition of equilibrium because no rigorous proof for this assumption exists. Previous work showed that for solids, the equilibrium positions of all constituent atoms of the solid are state variables (TC). In this study, this conclusion is further elaborated starting from the principles of solid-state physics. This theory has been applied to glass materials. Results show that first, the glass state is an equilibrium state. Accordingly, the properties of a glass can be solely described by the present positions of the atom, irrespective of their previous history. Second, the glass transition, although a nonequilibrium phenomenon, is well described using TCs if the thermal part of the energy is be assumed to be well separated from the structural part. The only dynamic parameter involved in this approach is the relaxation time, which is uniquely determined using the present values of the TCs. Therefore, complicated functions describing the past history are unnecessary. This implies that the activation energy for the structural relaxation strongly depends on TCs. This finding provides a reasonable understanding of the large deviations from the Arrhenius law. The unrealistic values of the activation energy and of the pre-exponential factor of the relaxation time can be resolved on this basis. The theory is particularly suitable for experiments that do not involve hypothetical quantities and models; therefore, all quantities are measurable.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.